From: Paul P Komkoff Jr <i@stingr.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 23:59:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net> (raw)
This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)
We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
directory, then delete it in order.
Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
evaluated because it will take long long time ...
both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...
real user sys
reiserfs:
Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s
Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s
Ext3:
Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s
Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s
htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...
--
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr /// (icq)23200764 /// (http)stingr.net
When you're invisible, the only one really watching you is you (my keychain)
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-01 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 19:59 Paul P Komkoff Jr [this message]
2002-10-01 20:43 ` [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 20:49 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 21:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-01 21:19 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-02 10:48 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 16:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-03 0:37 ` [Ext2-devel] " Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 12:04 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-03 19:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 19:44 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-04 15:53 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-04 17:09 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-07 6:54 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-10 0:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 21:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-02 16:38 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 6:39 ` Nikita Danilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net \
--to=i@stingr.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox