Re: export of sys_call_table

Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-04T09:01:38Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 445 bytes --]

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 01:06, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Would it be possible to put a secondary call table behind
> the call gate wrappered in sys_ni_syscall that a module
> could register against.
Why ?
Adding "unknown" syscalls is I doubt EVER a good idea.
LiS has *known* and *official* syscalls, they can easily live with a
stub like nfsd uses.... few lines of code and it's safe.

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]