public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbradford@dial.pipex.com
To: illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk (Illtud Daniel)
Cc: enorwood@effrem.com, kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu, roy@karlsbakk.net,
	jakob@unthought.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID backup
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:12:21 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210041112.g94BCLLQ002034@darkstar.example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9D6C84.F1736E15@llgc.org.uk> from "Illtud Daniel" at Oct 04, 2002 11:25:08 AM

> > In addition, HSM software costs
> > something (even if you write it yourself) on top of the tape infrastructure.
> > One customer of ours was quoted 40K per TB of HSM *software* alone.
> 
> I've got 25TB uncompressed of HSM here, and it's cost us (ex VAT)
> roughly:
> 
> £10k for the first 1.6TB (on NT, DLT library)
> £18k for the next  6.0TB (on NT, LTO library)
> £45k for the next 18.0TB (on Solaris, LTO Library)
> 
> ..for the software licencing alone. Plus about 10% pa. in support
> costs.
> You're looking at about 50-60% of the library cost for the HSM software
> to manage it (tapes are another thing). Is HSM really that difficult?
> 
> It really is a racket, but it's not so much compared with the
> cost of re-producing the data (mainly digitized collections).
> I'd be happier about it if they were more reliable (libs and s/w).
> Disk arrays, on the other hand, would cost us a fortune in
> upgrading the cooling - we've had to do this once just because of
> the 3-4 TB of online storage we've got, and adding huge exchangers
> (and associated pipes) isn't something I want to do much of.
> 
> Oh, and having spent much of last night and this morning dealing
> with multiple SCSI disk failures, and having seen about 5% of
> ours fail in a year, I'm rapidly seeing the light on IDE.

This is rapidly becoming off topic, especially for the kernel dev list, which is why I originally just posted the following info to the cc'ed people, but since it might be of interest, I'm posting it to the lists:

Sony GY-8240-DTF2 tape drive, picture of it, with some info here:

http://www.tomtec.co.jp/english/tape_hisped.html

this uses similar technology to that which is used in their Digital Betacam(tm) studio VCRs, and stores 200 Gigs uncompressed on one large tape, (60 on a small tape).

Data rate, 24 MB/s.

You've got to have a lot of data for that to be insufficient, and it would be my backup system of choice, if I needed the capcity, (I currently use punched Myler tape :-) ).

John.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-04 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-03 11:20 RAID backup jbradford
2002-10-03 11:26 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-10-03 11:36   ` jbradford
2002-10-03 20:00   ` Kanoalani Withington
2002-10-03 23:59     ` Effrem Norwood
2002-10-04  8:00       ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-04 10:25       ` Illtud Daniel
2002-10-04 11:12         ` jbradford [this message]
2002-10-04 11:20         ` Alvin Oga
2002-10-04 12:52           ` Alan Cox
2002-10-04 12:52             ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-10-04 13:24             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-10-04 14:07               ` Russell King
2002-10-04 17:15                 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-10-04 21:45                 ` Alvin Oga
2002-10-04 14:32               ` Luca Berra
2002-10-04 15:13                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-04 15:31                 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2002-10-04 16:11                   ` Russell King
2002-10-04 18:51                     ` Herman Oosthuysen
2002-10-04 21:37             ` RAID backup - media Alvin Oga
2002-10-04 18:58         ` RAID backup Kanoalani Withington
2002-10-04 21:51           ` RAID backup - mtx w/ tcl Alvin Oga
2002-10-04 21:59             ` Effrem Norwood
2002-10-04 22:22             ` Kanoalani Withington
2002-10-03 11:27 ` RAID backup Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-04 17:04 Cress, Andrew R
2002-10-05  3:13 Chris Adams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200210041112.g94BCLLQ002034@darkstar.example.net \
    --to=jbradford@dial.pipex.com \
    --cc=enorwood@effrem.com \
    --cc=illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk \
    --cc=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox