Re: New BK License Problem?

David S. Miller
2002-10-08T22:23:50Z

From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:24:44 +0100

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> How about
> bk-commits-head
> bk-commits-2.4
>
> then later bk-commits-2.6 etc...

How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry
about renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.

I expect people to maintain 2.4.x even when 2.6.x is
"stable" even once 2.7.x has begun.

Therefore, I like your first idea the best.

Ok?