From: Marek Habersack <grendel@debian.org>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: BK MetaData License Problem?
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:11:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021006191113.GA4151@thanes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DA0642A.1070706@colorfullife.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1895 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 06:26:18PM +0200, Manfred Spraul scribbled:
[snip]
> Marek Habersack wrote:
> >
> >Perhaps I am being silly at the moment, but wouldn't it suffice in this
> >case
> >to put a statement in your commit message (I believe it can be automated)
> >stating that this message and the comitted data are licensed under the GPL?
> >
>
> For example.
> Or a sentence in the Licensing file, or whatever.("If you want to
> contribute to the development at www.kernel.org, then you must agree to
> the following conditions: You name will be used, your commit text will
> be used, your mail address will be published etc." No GPL conflict, you
> are free to fork)
I don't think that would suffice in this case. The problem is not in your or
anybody else's consent to the terms of GPL, but that the BK license doesn't
make it clear (as I understand) as to what is the legal status of the
metadata - i.e. what's the license that pertains to it. Also, this is not
BitMover's problem actually - thus the user, developer, would have to take
care to make a clear statement as to what the changelog license is. Or,
perhaps, BitMover could add to the license that the any software (i.e.
source code, documentation, log messages etc.) are accepted under the same
license as the, say, whole repository for the software unless otherwise
stated. Then only one file in the repository would suffice to make the
situation clear - it might be even done in a way that the bk tools display
the contents of this file (let's call it a "banner") once per "session" (by
default, of course) - to ascertain that anybody using the repository will
(or may) see the contents of the file. Maybe I'm rambling :), but that looks
like a sane solution to me (not being the BK user and not even liking it, I
don't know whether such a "motd" file is possible).
regards,
marek
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-06 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-06 12:40 BK MetaData License Problem? Manfred Spraul
2002-10-06 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-06 15:48 ` Marek Habersack
2002-10-06 16:26 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-06 19:11 ` Marek Habersack [this message]
2002-10-06 16:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-06 16:22 ` Larry McVoy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-07 0:11 Hell.Surfers
2002-10-06 10:59 New BK " David S. Miller
2002-10-06 12:04 ` BK MetaData " Ingo Molnar
2002-10-06 11:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-06 12:18 ` jbradford
2002-10-06 12:35 ` jw schultz
2002-10-06 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-06 16:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-10-06 13:48 ` Russell King
2002-10-06 14:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-06 14:08 ` Russell King
2002-10-06 16:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-06 17:06 ` jbradford
2002-10-06 19:12 ` Marek Habersack
2002-10-06 14:23 ` jbradford
2002-10-06 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-06 20:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-06 22:52 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-07 6:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-07 6:07 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-06 17:17 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-10-06 17:38 ` Larry McVoy
2002-10-06 17:41 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-06 17:45 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-10-06 22:49 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021006191113.GA4151@thanes.org \
--to=grendel@debian.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox