Re: New BK License Problem?

Dave Jones
2002-10-08T22:18:52Z

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> > Should we have two lists, one for 2.4 and one for 2.5?
> > I'll set it up once decided.
>
> Probably one for each. We could add headers which say which branch it is
> but that's still a lot of extra traffic for subscribers who only want the
> stable branch info and will filter the 2.5 ones to /dev/null.
>
> How about
> bk-commits-head
> bk-commits-2.4
>
> then later bk-commits-2.6 etc...

How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry
about renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.

Dave

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk