From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 03:31:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 03:31:08 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:18337 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 03:31:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:36:31 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Pavel Machek Cc: vojtech@suse.cz, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Input - Make i8042.c less picky about AUX ports [1/3] Message-ID: <20021010093631.A7994@ucw.cz> References: <200210100725.JAA00155@bug.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200210100725.JAA00155@bug.ucw.cz>; from pavel@ucw.cz on Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:23:40AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:23:40AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > ChangeSet@1.597.3.1, 2002-10-08 17:36:32+02:00, vojtech@suse.cz > > Make i8042.c even less picky about detecting an AUX port because of > > broken chipsets that don't support the LOOP command or report failure > > on the TEST command. Hopefully this won't screw any old 386/486 > > systems without the AUX port. > > would it make sense to at least printk() on such > broken chipsets? Maybe. But if we wanted to printk() on every chipset which doesn't follow the i8042 spec in some way, we'd keep the logs full ... -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs