From: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mbligh@arcanet.com, habanero@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Simple NUMA Scheduler - rev 2
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:03:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210121003.45856.efocht@ess.nec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4450000.1034371619@flay>
Hi Martin,
what is the cache_decay_ticks value for these results? Is it the
default (i.e. = 0 )?
Erich
On Friday 11 October 2002 23:26, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> OK, that's the first one that looks better to me across the board in both
> kernbench and Eric's tests - congrats .... do_schedule seems to be a little
> slow, not sure if that's fixable or not. Will test Erich's new stuff this
> evening (I hope).
>
> (lower numbers are better).
>
> Kernbench:
> Elapsed User System CPU
> 2.5.41-mm3 19.946s 192.44s 44.15s 1186%
> 2.5.41-mm3-sched41rev1 20.07s 190.058s 43.434s 1163.2%
>
> Schedbench 4:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> 2.5.41-mm3 33.80 48.12 135.24 0.74
> 2.5.41-mm3-sched41rev1 22.42 37.08 89.70 0.65
>
> Schedbench 8:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> 2.5.41-mm3 46.92 81.47 375.44 1.65
> 2.5.41-mm3-sched41rev1 31.09 45.17 248.81 1.59
>
> Schedbench 16:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> 2.5.41-mm3 64.81 82.92 1037.24 5.55
> 2.5.41-mm3-sched41rev1 51.79 63.72 828.76 4.58
>
> Schedbench 32:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> 2.5.41-mm3 95.36 223.18 3052.02 12.57
> 2.5.41-mm3-sched41rev1 55.42 123.27 1773.77 7.83
>
> Schedbench 64:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> 2.5.41-mm3 156.15 638.75 9994.56 27.37
> 2.5.41-mm3-sched41rev1 57.92 256.19 3707.48 16.90
>
> ----------------------
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-12 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-09 23:56 [RFC] Simple NUMA Scheduler - rev 2 Michael Hohnbaum
[not found] ` <4450000.1034371619@flay>
2002-10-12 8:03 ` Erich Focht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210121003.45856.efocht@ess.nec.de \
--to=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=mbligh@arcanet.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox