From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:22:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021014122239.GA29240@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021014101209.A18123@medelec.uia.ac.be>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:12:09AM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I have downloaded your latest patch and will use it to update the watchdog
> drivers. I'll be doing some additional cleanup and additions myself probably.
>
> Now I'm still left with my original question: wouldn't it be easier if we
> put all watchdog drivers in drivers/char/watchdog/ ?
I'd say go for it. drivers/char/ is looking quite cluttered, and this
has the added advantage of decreasing the size of the Config.in and
config.help files too.
One thing though, please do the move first, and submit that, then do the
cleanups and submit seperatly. It makes things much easier to track
whats going on.
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-14 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 17:40 Watchdog drivers Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-13 19:01 ` Russell King
2002-10-13 22:31 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-13 22:43 ` Russell King
2002-10-13 23:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-14 1:57 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-14 8:12 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 12:22 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-10-14 12:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 13:04 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 15:11 ` Rob Radez
2002-10-15 9:35 ` David Woodhouse
2002-10-15 11:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-14 15:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-14 9:29 ` Padraig Brady
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-14 15:51 Matt_Domsch
2002-10-14 16:40 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-14 19:12 ` Matt Domsch
2002-10-15 9:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-15 17:26 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-16 21:36 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-11-06 13:10 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2002-10-15 12:57 Matt_Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021014122239.GA29240@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rob@osinvestor.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox