From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:17:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:17:16 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:61878 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:17:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021016.181550.88499112.davem@redhat.com> To: acme@conectiva.com.br Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: make arp seq_file show method only produce one record per call From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20021017011108.GT7541@conectiva.com.br> References: <20021017010135.GR7541@conectiva.com.br> <20021016.175809.28811497.davem@redhat.com> <20021017011108.GT7541@conectiva.com.br> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:11:08 -0300 That would be nice, yes, bastardizing pos for this is, humm, ugly, and it isn't accessible at show time (pun intended 8) ). Can you remind me what the original objection was to just using seq->private? Is it used, or planned to be used, by something else?