Re: [PATCH] Re: Pathological case identified from contest

Rik van Riel
2002-10-20T14:25:20Z

On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:

> The rest of the results were otherwise similar. It seems your patch
> served to disadvantage kernel compilation in preference for more of the
> background load.

Probably a priority inheritance thing between parent and child
processes, this should be easily fixable to be fairer (if it
isn't already fairest with Jim's patch).