public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, hugh@veritas.com, willy@debian.org,
	akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem missing cache flush
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021021.082107.56539790.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1035212657.27259.154.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

   From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
   Date: 21 Oct 2002 16:04:17 +0100
   
   I disagree here. Its a measurable performance item, and its actually
   going to break less code than for example the last minute scsi and bio
   changes have done
   
That's a good point.

So, if you want to merge the deprecation to Linus when he returns
I'd fully support it :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-21 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-16 18:26 [PATCH] shmem missing cache flush Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-16 23:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-16 23:58   ` David S. Miller
2002-10-17  0:19     ` Russell King
2002-10-17  0:16       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-21 15:04         ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 15:21           ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-10-21 16:12             ` Alan Cox
2002-10-28 14:10               ` David S. Miller
2002-10-28 14:32                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 14:26                   ` David S. Miller
2002-10-28 16:36                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 16:55                       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-28 17:06                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 16:58                           ` David S. Miller
2002-10-29 21:52                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 17:08                       ` Alan Cox
2002-10-28 16:52                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 14:35                 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-28 14:26                   ` David S. Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-28 16:50 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021021.082107.56539790.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox