Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] PC-9800 architecture (CORE only)

[Andrey Panin <pazke@orbita1.ru>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1129 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:49:19PM +0900, Osamu Tomita wrote:
> This is a part of big patchset for support PC-9800 architecture, one of i386
> sub architectures.
> Core part cleanup has done. (But device drivers are still working.)
> Many "#if" are killed by using "mach-xxx" framework.
> If someone pick up this, we are very happy.
> Comments are always welcome. Please tell me.

Ok, you asked for it :)) 

>  	if (boot_cpu_data.hard_math && !cpu_has_fpu)
> -		setup_irq(13, &irq13);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PC9800
> +		setup_irq(13, &fpu_irq);
> +#else
> +		setup_irq(8, &fpu_irq);
> +#endif
>  }

May be this should be done this way (with FPU_IRQ_NUMBER hidden in the
arch specific header):

-		setup_irq(13, &irq13);
+		setup_irq(FPU_IRQ_NUMBER, &fpu_irq);


> diff -urN linux/arch/i386/kernel/pc9800_debug.c linux98/arch/i386/kernel/pc9800_debug.c

Why this file is not in mach-pc9800 directory ?

And what is IORESOURCE98_SPARSE flag in mach-pc9800/mach_resources.h file ?

-- 
Andrey Panin            | Embedded systems software developer
pazke@orbita1.ru        | PGP key: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]