Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c

Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-22T21:42:45Z

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:57:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On PA-RISC we have 36 signals defined for hpux compatibility. So M()
> > and T() in kernel/signal.c try to do (1UL << 33) which is garbage on 32-bit
> > architectures. How do people feel about this patch?
>
> How does the compiler output look ?

uhh.. 200 bytes extra on x86 ;-(

-rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17956 Oct 22 14:44 kernel/signal.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 willy users 17748 Oct 22 06:50 kernel/signal.o_orig