Re: [PATCH] use 1ULL instead of 1UL in kernel/signal.c

Alan Cox
2002-10-22T21:35:40Z

On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On PA-RISC we have 36 signals defined for hpux compatibility. So M()
> and T() in kernel/signal.c try to do (1UL << 33) which is garbage on 32-bit
> architectures. How do people feel about this patch?

How does the compiler output look ?