From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs.
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:04:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021023160450.E3750@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB6FF24.9B50A7C0@digeo.com>; from akpm@digeo.com on Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:57:24PM -0700
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:57:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > ext3
> > tar zxf linux-2.5.44.tar.gz 2.5.44-mm3 2.5.44-ac2
> > user 4.42 4.39
> > system 4.09 4.05
> > elapsed 00:53.17 00:34.05
> > % CPU 16 24
>
> The smaller fifo_batch setting hurts when there are competing
> reads and writes on the same disk.
Is the ext2/3 allocation heuristic fix in yet? That might swing things
around again too.
-ben
--
"Do you seek knowledge in time travel?"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 19:42 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared for various fs Steven Cole
2002-10-23 19:57 ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs Andrew Morton
2002-10-23 20:04 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2002-10-23 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 8:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-23 20:05 ` Steven Cole
2002-10-23 20:32 ` Steven Cole
2002-10-23 20:44 ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball comparedforvarious fs Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 3:10 ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs Hans Reiser
2002-10-24 9:54 ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-10-24 11:37 ` Padraig Brady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021023160450.E3750@redhat.com \
--to=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).