From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
Cc: Frank Cornelis <fcorneli@elis.rug.ac.be>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extended ptrace
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:45:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021023184519.GA18122@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1035388815.5646.42.camel@plars>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:00:13AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 11:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:01, Frank Cornelis wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > A new extended ptrace patch is available at:
> > > > http://www.elis.rug.ac.be/~fcorneli/downloads/devel/exptrace-0.3.1.patch.gz
> > > Do you (or anyone else) have any good tests for this, or even ptrace in
> > > general? I'm working on some ptrace tests for LTP, but if someone
> > > already has something to contribute it would save me some time. :)
> >
> > GDB and gdbserver get a good range of it; just pick a couple of the
> > standard tests (to avoid problems with all the GDB bugs the testsuite
> > turns up :). I have some more precise tests but they're for
> > features that haven't been accepted yet.
> Precise tests that can be automated and ran under our test harness are
> more along the lines of what I'm looking for. If those features do go
> in, it might be nice to have them in LTP if you don't mind.
No, I mean from GDB's automated regression suite. Build gdb from
source and 'make check' to see it. There's a lot of tests which fail
for reasons you aren't interested in, but a lot of them could just be
incorporated.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 15:01 [PATCH] extended ptrace Frank Cornelis
2002-10-23 15:33 ` Paul Larson
2002-01-16 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-23 16:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-23 16:00 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-23 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021023184519.GA18122@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=fcorneli@elis.rug.ac.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox