From: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez <linux-kernel@24x7linux.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.44 fs corruption
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:08:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021023210808.GC4138@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OAEPKDBINGEGKPCJJAJDKEMDHJAA.chris.newland@emorphia.com>
On Wednesday, 23 October 2002, at 16:13:52 +0100,
Chris Newland wrote:
> A good way to test if the problem has gone is to try to 'dd' the contents of
> an entire partition into /dev/null. This used to have a 100% lockup rate
> when I had the problem.
>
> dd if=/dev/hda5 of=/dev/null bs=1048576
>
As a side note to this thread, I suffered for months similar lockups
with a VIA KT266A based motherboard for my AMD Athlon XP1700+. As it was
really obvious the problem was hardware (BIOS probably) related, I didn't
bothered the list.
In my case (Soltek SL-75DRV2), a "dd" as the above didn't locked up the
machin (at least, not always), but chances of locking up increased
dramatically if at the same time I had "xawtv" (or another TV tuner
program for video4linux compatible cards). As a TV station pumps in the
order of several MB/s to the PCI bus, plus another ~ 40 MB/s of
sustained read rates from the IDE ATA100 disk, somehow a bug in the
BIOS/southbridge was more obvious.
Fortunately the motherboard crashed, and I got a replacement from the
same manufacturer, but a newer model, namely a SL-75DRV5 (VIA KT333
based if I remember correctly), with a completely different BIOS version
number. And since then (10+ days) no lockups, even under high stress.
Hope this experience helps others with their (maybe hardware caused)
locks in Linux (when the box hangs, and you have no idea why, you even
end up blaming Linux :).
--
Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Woody (Linux 2.4.19-pre6aa1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-22 22:07 2.5.44 fs corruption erik
2002-10-23 4:51 ` module_init in interrupt context ? Armin Schindler
2002-10-23 16:13 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-10-24 16:52 ` Armin Schindler
2002-10-24 17:14 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-10-25 6:15 ` Armin Schindler
2002-10-25 9:04 ` Russell King
2002-10-23 10:19 ` 2.5.44 fs corruption Chris Newland
2002-10-23 14:46 ` erik
2002-10-23 15:13 ` Chris Newland
2002-10-23 21:08 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez [this message]
2002-10-24 3:30 ` erik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021023210808.GC4138@localhost \
--to=linux-kernel@24x7linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).