* kernel hooks interface available to non-GPL modules?
@ 2002-10-23 13:42 Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-24 7:10 ` Vamsi Krishna S .
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2002-10-23 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vamsi Krishna S .; +Cc: linux-kernel
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(hook_exit_deregister);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(hook_exit_arm);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(hook_exit_disarm);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_hook_initialise);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_hook_terminate);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_hook_exit_register);
I'm not sure this is a great idea. OK, your DECLARE_HOOK macros are _GPL
(and why are they _NOVERS_GPL? Surely this is the exact kind of thing
you want versioned?), but I wouldn't have to use the DECLARE_HOOK macros,
would I?
If you thought the LSM GPL furore was bad, this one would be worse.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-24 6:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-23 13:42 kernel hooks interface available to non-GPL modules? Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-24 7:10 ` Vamsi Krishna S .
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).