From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:51:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:51:40 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:8249 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:51:38 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200210261357.g9QDvgl13774@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Double x86 initialise fix. To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk (Dave Jones) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:57:42 -0400 (EDT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List), alan@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20021026134947.GA31349@suse.de> from "Dave Jones" at Oct 26, 2002 02:49:47 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Isn't this always the case on x86 ? > /me waits to hear gory details of some IBM monster. It isnt. The boot CPU may be any number. In addition you can strap dual pentium boxes to arbitrate for who is boot cpu (this is used for fault tolerance).