public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: hugh@veritas.com
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, willy@debian.org,
	akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem missing cache flush
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:26:48 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021028.062648.16072775.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210281429160.10214-100000@localhost.localdomain>

   From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
   Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:35:15 +0000 (GMT)
   
   I like your patch, but what has changed?  Are those platforms which
   were using flush_page_to_ram() now committed to its elimination?
   Or have they already replaced it (not seen in your patch)?
   
No they have to fix their port to use the supported interface,
simply.  That's why I added the "#error " lines telling the person
compiling on such a platform what needs to happen.

   

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-28 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-16 18:26 [PATCH] shmem missing cache flush Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-16 23:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-16 23:58   ` David S. Miller
2002-10-17  0:19     ` Russell King
2002-10-17  0:16       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-21 15:04         ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 15:21           ` David S. Miller
2002-10-21 16:12             ` Alan Cox
2002-10-28 14:10               ` David S. Miller
2002-10-28 14:32                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 14:26                   ` David S. Miller
2002-10-28 16:36                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 16:55                       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-28 17:06                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 16:58                           ` David S. Miller
2002-10-29 21:52                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 17:08                       ` Alan Cox
2002-10-28 16:52                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-28 14:35                 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-28 14:26                   ` David S. Miller [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-28 16:50 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021028.062648.16072775.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox