From: chrisl@vmware.com
To: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisl@gnuchina.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: writepage return value check in vmscan.c
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021028184420.GB1454@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <elabj7bt.fsf@sap.com>
They are the same as shmfs to linux kernel. Why does vmware not use it
in the first place? It is possible due to some the history reason.
BTW, I have another question. For the 8G memory machine, do we need
to setup 16G swap space? Think about the time it take to write 16G
data, does it still make sense that swap space is twice as big as
memory?
And the swap partition has limit as 2G. So we need to setup 8 swap
partitions if we want 16G swap.
Thanks
Chris
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:28:22AM +0100, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, chrisl@vmware.com wrote:
> > Yes, shmfs seems to be the only choice so far.
>
> So why don't you use Posix or SYSV shared mem?
>
> Greetings
> Christoph
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-28 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-24 8:25 writepage return value check in vmscan.c chrisl
2002-10-24 8:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 9:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-24 11:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 16:12 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 17:59 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 11:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 18:30 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 18:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 19:14 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 19:25 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 17:57 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 18:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 19:15 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 20:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-24 21:17 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 21:23 ` chrisl
2002-10-24 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 16:11 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-25 17:07 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-25 18:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-28 19:17 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-28 20:38 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 21:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-28 8:28 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-10-28 18:44 ` chrisl [this message]
2002-10-28 19:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-28 19:29 ` chrisl
2002-10-29 6:10 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 7:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-28 19:58 ` chrisl
2002-10-28 21:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-30 4:13 ` chrisl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021028184420.GB1454@vmware.com \
--to=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=chrisl@gnuchina.org \
--cc=cr@sap.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).