From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: boissiere@adiglobal.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 30, 2002
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021030.184443.87162307.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021031.114832.59687399.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:48:32 +0900 (JST)
In article <20021030.143615.10738219.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:36:15 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
> We told you several times how this USAGI patch is not currently in an
> acceptable form and needs to be reimplemented via the routing code.
Yes, but I think
- integrate our code to your tree
then
- reimplement (re-design)
is better way to go forward.
Absolutely not, we do not put improperly architected code into the
tree first then clean it up later.
Especially because this source address selection code interferes with
many IPSEC issues. Source address selection belongs at routing
tables, and there is no arguing about this. If you put it somewhere
else it gets in the way and causes many problems.
Please implement source address selection properly, then resubmit.
Thank you.
I need to check the result of current code and
to look at diff by byte-to-byte before preparing
patches for current tree.
Ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 15:13 [STATUS 2.5] October 30, 2002 Guillaume Boissiere
2002-10-30 15:55 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-30 22:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-31 2:48 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-31 2:44 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-10-31 3:07 ` kuznet
2002-10-31 3:16 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-31 3:13 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-30 16:17 Dave Jones
2002-10-30 17:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-31 6:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-31 10:56 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 16:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-31 14:40 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-31 23:01 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-01 14:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-11-01 16:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-01 17:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-02 12:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-11-04 14:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-04 15:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-11-01 18:17 Ed Vance
2002-11-01 18:46 ` Malcolm Beattie
2002-11-01 19:14 Ken Ryan
2002-11-01 19:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-01 21:27 ` Ken Ryan
2002-11-01 22:25 Ed Vance
2002-11-02 0:33 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-11-04 17:14 Ed Vance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021030.184443.87162307.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=boissiere@adiglobal.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox