From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: boissiere@adiglobal.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STATUS 2.5] October 30, 2002
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:13:50 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021030.191350.79592740.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021031.121609.71851601.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:16:09 +0900 (JST)
In article <20021030.184443.87162307.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:44:43 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
> Absolutely not, we do not put improperly architected code into the
> tree first then clean it up later.
That patch do NOT change current architecture so above is unfair.
Ok, I correct myself, this patch adds more dependencies on badly
architected area making it _harder_ for us to clean it up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 15:13 [STATUS 2.5] October 30, 2002 Guillaume Boissiere
2002-10-30 15:55 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-30 22:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-31 2:48 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-31 2:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-31 3:07 ` kuznet
2002-10-31 3:16 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-10-31 3:13 ` David S. Miller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-30 16:17 Dave Jones
2002-10-30 17:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-31 6:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-31 10:56 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 16:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-31 14:40 ` Dave Jones
2002-10-31 23:01 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-01 14:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-11-01 16:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-01 17:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-02 12:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-11-04 14:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-04 15:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-11-01 18:17 Ed Vance
2002-11-01 18:46 ` Malcolm Beattie
2002-11-01 19:14 Ken Ryan
2002-11-01 19:56 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-01 21:27 ` Ken Ryan
2002-11-01 22:25 Ed Vance
2002-11-02 0:33 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-11-04 17:14 Ed Vance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021030.191350.79592740.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=boissiere@adiglobal.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox