From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:29:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:28:20 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:29640 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:25:06 -0500 To: hch@infradead.org Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, peter@chubb.wattle.id.au, tytso@mit.edu In-reply-to: <20021031032253.A20572@infradead.org> (message from Christoph Hellwig on Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:22:53 +0000) Subject: Re: What's left over. Reply-To: tridge@samba.org Message-Id: <20021031033132.4ED792C269@lists.samba.org> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:31:32 -0500 (EST) From: tridge@samba.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > XFS doesn't have ACLs either in plain 2.5. The existing NAS boxes that use Linux and XFS tend to base their kernels on the 2.4-xfs tree from cvs on sgi.com. It works well and the SGI guys have been very good about fixing problems when they crop up. I think that the biggest beneficiary of adding extended attributes and ACLs into ext3 for 2.6 would be more casual users (home, small office etc) as they will then be able to use ACLs in Samba without the pain of switching to a different kernel. Cheers, Tridge -- http://samba.org/~tridge/