From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:31:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:31:36 -0500 Received: from 24-216-100-96.charter.com ([24.216.100.96]:46547 "EHLO wally.rdlg.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:31:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:19:50 -0500 From: "Robert L. Harris" To: Linux-Kernel Subject: Reiser vs EXT3 Message-ID: <20021031141950.GM3420@rdlg.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Robert L. Harris" , Linux-Kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Still working on that replacement mail server and a new rumor has hit the mix. It follows that reiserfs is much faster than ext3 (made ext3, not converted from ext2 if it matters) and this is causing some problems. On a 200Gig filesystem is this truely an issue? Thanks, Robert :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. FYI: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'