From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
Paul McKenney <paul.mckenney@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: dcache_rcu [performance results]
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:23:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021031162330.B12797@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021030161912.E2613@in.ibm.com>; from maneesh@in.ibm.com on Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:19:12PM +0530
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:19:12PM +0530, Maneesh Soni wrote:
> Hello Viro,
>
> Please consider forwarding the following patch ito Linus for dcache lookup
> using Read Copy Update. The patch has been there in -mm kernel since
> 2.5.37-mm1. The patch is stable. A couple of bugs reported are solved. It
> helps a great deal on higher end SMP machines and there is no performance
> regression on UP and lower end SMP machines as seen in Dipankar's kernbench
> numbers.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103462075416638&w=2
>
Anton (Blanchard) did some benchmarking with this
in a 24-way ppc64 box and the results showed why we need this patch.
Here are some performace comparisons based on a multi-user benchmark
that Anton ran with vanilla 2.5.40 and 2.5.40-mm.
http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/dcache/summary.png
base = 2.5.40
base-nops = 2.5.40 but ps command in benchmark scripts commented out
mm = 2.5.40-mm
mm-nops = 2.5.40-mm but ps command in benchmark scripts commented out
Here is a profile output snippet of base and mm runs at 200 scripts -
base :
Hits Percentage Function
------------------------
75185 100.00 total
11215 14.92 path_lookup
8578 11.41 atomic_dec_and_lock
5763 7.67 do_lookup
5745 7.64 proc_pid_readlink
4344 5.78 page_remove_rmap
2144 2.85 page_add_rmap
1587 2.11 link_path_walk
1531 2.04 proc_check_root
1461 1.94 save_remaining_regs
1345 1.79 inode_change_ok
1236 1.64 ext2_free_blocks
1215 1.62 ext2_new_block
1067 1.42 d_lookup
1053 1.40 number
907 1.21 release_pages
mm :
Hits Percentage Function
62369 100.00 total
5802 9.30 page_remove_rmap
4092 6.56 atomic_dec_and_lock
3887 6.23 proc_pid_readlink
3207 5.14 follow_mount
2979 4.78 page_add_rmap
2066 3.31 save_remaining_regs
1856 2.98 d_lookup
1629 2.61 number
1235 1.98 release_pages
1168 1.87 pSeries_flush_hash_range
1154 1.85 do_page_fault
1026 1.65 copy_page
1009 1.62 path_lookup
Thanks
--
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 10:49 [PATCH 2.5.44] dcache_rcu Maneesh Soni
2002-10-31 10:53 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2002-11-02 1:36 ` dcache_rcu [performance results] Andrew Morton
2002-11-02 9:13 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-11-04 17:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-05 0:00 ` jw schultz
2002-11-05 1:14 ` ps performance sucks (was Re: dcache_rcu [performance results]) Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-05 3:57 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-11-05 4:42 ` Erik Andersen
2002-11-05 5:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-05 5:59 ` Alexander Viro
2002-11-05 6:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-05 6:15 ` Robert Love
2002-11-05 6:13 ` Erik Andersen
2002-11-05 6:14 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-11-05 4:26 ` jw schultz
2002-11-05 5:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-05 19:57 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-11-05 21:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-11-05 22:09 ` Karim Yaghmour
[not found] <20021030161912.E2613@in.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20021031162330.B12797@in.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3DC32C03.C3910128@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20021102144306.A6736@dikhow.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-11-02 10:08 ` dcache_rcu [performance results] Andi Kleen
2002-11-02 10:54 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-11-02 11:01 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-02 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-02 21:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021031162330.B12797@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=paul.mckenney@us.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox