Re: CONFIG_TINY

Tom Rini
2002-10-31T01:03:54Z

On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:53:14AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> >...
> > As before, your comments and suggestions will be
> > appreciated.
>
> could you try to use "-Os" instead of "-O2" as gcc optimization option
> when CONFIG_TINY is enabled? Something like the following (completely
> untested) patch:

-Os can produce larger binaries, keep in mind. If we're going to go
this route, how about something generally useful, and allow for general
optimization level / additional CFLAGS to be added.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)