Re: CONFIG_TINY

Alan Cox
2002-11-05T19:32:31Z

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 19:26, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > Then we don't we always use -Os?
>
> 1 - I'm not sure all versions of gcc support it, as in "it generates
> correct code."

2.95 built with -Os was I believe used by Caldera and turned out faster
code than -O2. For 3.2 -O2 appears faster {yes I know
microbenchmarking is not the full picture}