Re: CONFIG_TINY

Tom Rini
2002-11-05T19:52:56Z

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:13:48AM +0000, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> > > I've used -Os. I've compiled dozens and dozens of packages with -Os. It has
> > > always saved at least a few bytes, I have yet to see it make something
> > > larger. And in the benchmarks I've done, the smaller code actually runs
> > > slightly faster. More of it fits in cache, you know.
> >
> > Then we don't we always use -Os?
>
[snip 6 good reasons]

So why do we want to force it on for CONFIG_TINY?

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)