From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:24:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:24:46 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:7944 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:24:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:31:12 +0000 From: Russell King To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Where's the documentation for Kconfig? Message-ID: <20021101193112.B26989@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Roman Zippel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021031134308.I27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20021101125226.B16919@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ok, next problem. A "hex" config entry under the old config language used to omit the "0x" prefix, requiring it to be added by whatever used it. Kconfig adds the "0x" prefix, thereby causing errors. Is this difference intentional? -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html