From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 03:36:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 03:36:26 -0500 Received: from vitelus.com ([64.81.243.207]:55561 "EHLO vitelus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 03:36:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 00:42:27 -0800 From: Aaron Lehmann To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linus Torvalds , LKML , hpa@zytor.com, viro@math.psu.edu Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] initramfs merge, part 1 of N Message-ID: <20021102084226.GA7800@vitelus.com> References: <3DC38939.90001@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DC38939.90001@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 03:13:45AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > The Future. > > Early userspace is going to be merged in a series of evolutionary > changes, following what I call "The Al Viro model." NO KERNEL BEHAVIOR > SHOULD CHANGE. [that's for the lkml listeners, not you ] "make" > will continue to simply Do The Right Thing(tm) on all platforms, while > the kernel image continues to get progressively smaller. Won't the initial userspace be linked into the kernel? If so, why will the kernel image get smaller?