Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)

Dave Jones
2002-11-02T21:29:12Z

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:36:08PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:

> > Yes please :)
> > GTK+ is probably the most common (decent) toolkit out there - nearly any
> > system with X has it installed, from what I've seen.
> Oh please....
> Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
> qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
> the library?

Linus mentioned this a while ago. This kind of holy war is going to
happen regardless of the library used. There's no reason that a
GTK config tool would have to be merged anyway, it could live
as a seperate project (as could the qt one really imo), outside
the kernel sources.

Dave

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk