From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: interrupt checks for spinlocks
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:42:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021104014224.GR23425@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1036372685.752.7.camel@phantasy>
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 19:53, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This non-reentrant stuff hurts my head. Another patch down the
>> toilet, I guess.
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 08:18:04PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> No, I think you have a good idea. Pete is right, though, the current
> interrupt is disabled... but normally the other interrupts are still
> enabled.
> Your ideas #2, #3, and #4 are good.
> Because once the lock is tainted, you still want to ensure process
> context disables interrupts before grabbing the lock.
> Robert Love
I'll go figure out why before posting a follow-up. This is not doing
what I wanted it to because the only one I originally wanted was (1),
having to do with interrupt-time recursion on rwlocks and writer
starvation caused by it.
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-04 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1036362421.16883.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200211040028.gA40S8600593@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20021104002813.GZ16347@holomorphy.com>
2002-11-04 0:42 ` interrupt checks for spinlocks Pete Zaitcev
2002-11-04 0:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-04 1:18 ` Robert Love
2002-11-04 1:42 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-11-04 3:01 ` Robert Love
2002-11-04 3:04 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-04 3:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-04 3:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-11-03 22:08 William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-04 0:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-04 0:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-04 1:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-04 1:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-04 5:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-11-04 15:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-04 13:31 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021104014224.GR23425@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox