public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Straz <nstraz@sgi.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:44:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021105154417.GD2030@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC70C0C.4040004@ixiacom.com> <00fd01c2845e$eb407ee0$7fd40a0a@amr.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 04:04:32PM -0800, Geoff Gustafson wrote:
> > You are about to duplicate http://ltp.sf.net
> 
> My understanding is that LTP is focused on current mainline kernel testing,
[ .. snip .. ]
> This project is concerned with the POSIX APIs regardless of where they are
> implemented (kernel, glibc, etc.). 

You are correct.  LTP isn't trying to be any kind of "compliance" test.
We're just trying to exercise and stress the Linux kernel to find bugs
and guard against regressions.

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 04:08:44PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I urge you to consider ways in which you could work within the
> framework of the LTP to meet both your goals and the LTP's goals.
> They may be more in synch than you originally thought!

I don't think LTP's "framework[1]" is going to help Geoff complete his
project.  Geoff already created a SourceForge site.  As part of the
LTP, I probably would have given him a separate CVS module and a mailing
list.  I think he has everything he needs to get started already.  

That being said, if Geoff does want his Open POSIX test suite to be part
of the LTP, we'll gladly accomodate him.  



[1] By framework I think you mean logistical, not libraries.  I think
our test libraries have some things he might like.  I just recommend
cleaning them up before using them. 
-- 
Nate Straz                                              nstraz@sgi.com
sgi, inc                                           http://www.sgi.com/
Linux Test Project                                  http://ltp.sf.net/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-05 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-04 23:29 [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite Dan Kegel
2002-11-05  0:04 ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-05  0:08   ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-05  0:24   ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-05  3:18     ` Christopher Yeoh
2002-11-05 15:44   ` Nathan Straz [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-05 18:24 Stephanie Glass
2002-11-05 19:05 ` Rusty Lynch
2002-11-05 15:49 Stephanie Glass
2002-11-05 16:43 ` Rusty Lynch
2002-11-04 22:48 Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 22:58 ` Larry McVoy
2002-11-04 23:17   ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 23:57 ` Christopher Yeoh
2002-11-05  0:44   ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-05  2:26     ` Andreas Dilger
2002-11-05  3:35     ` Christopher Yeoh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021105154417.GD2030@sgi.com \
    --to=nstraz@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox