public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.46-mm1 with contest
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:53:18 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211080953.22903.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here are contest results showing 2.5.46-mm1 with preempt enabled. The other 
kernels have it disabled.

noload:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          75.7    91      0       0       1.06
2.5.46 [2]              74.1    92      0       0       1.04
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          74.0    93      0       0       1.04

cacherun:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          69.3    99      0       0       0.97
2.5.46 [2]              67.9    99      0       0       0.95
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          68.9    99      0       0       0.96

process_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          190.6   36      166     63      2.67
2.5.45 [5]              91.0    75      33      27      1.27
2.5.46 [1]              92.9    74      36      29      1.30
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          82.7    82      21      21      1.16

Much improved 

ctar_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          97.3    79      1       5       1.36
2.5.46 [1]              98.3    80      1       7       1.38
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          95.3    80      1       5       1.33

xtar_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          207.6   37      2       7       2.91
2.5.46 [1]              113.5   67      1       8       1.59
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          227.1   34      3       7       3.18

Whatever was causing this to be high in 2.5.44-mm6 is still there now.

io_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          284.1   28      20      10      3.98
2.5.46 [1]              600.5   13      48      12      8.41
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          134.3   58      6       8       1.88

Big change here. IO load is usually the one we feel the most.

read_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          104.3   73      7       4       1.46
2.5.46 [1]              103.5   75      7       4       1.45
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          103.2   74      6       4       1.45

list_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          95.3    75      1       20      1.33
2.5.46 [1]              96.8    74      2       22      1.36
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          101.4   70      1       22      1.42

mem_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.44-mm6 [3]          226.9   33      50      2       3.18
2.5.46 [3]              148.0   51      34      2       2.07
2.5.46-mm1 [5]          180.5   41      35      1       2.53

And this remains relatively high but better than 2.5.44-mm6

Unfortunately I've only run this with preempt enabled so far and I believe 
many of the improvements are showing this effect.

Con.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9yu7eF6dfvkL3i1gRAqGIAJ9f6XFfwO0sQOVBn5qZPfAFY5JdlwCggOZt
WXizAEgC23W+AURXApih9xc=
=MCT0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


             reply	other threads:[~2002-11-07 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-07 22:53 Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-11-07 23:48 ` [BENCHMARK] 2.5.46-mm1 with contest Robert Love
2002-11-07 23:58   ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-08  0:04     ` Robert Love
2002-11-08  6:04       ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-08  0:10     ` Benjamin LaHaise
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-08  0:32 Alan Willis
2002-11-08  0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-08 21:08   ` Alan Willis
2002-11-08 21:21     ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]       ` <YWxhbg==.a11f3fbc6d68c50c7f190513c1d3bacf@1037045821.cotse.net>
2002-11-11 21:03         ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-11 21:11           ` Alan Willis
2002-11-11 21:32             ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-13  0:14               ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-12 20:07                 ` Alan Willis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200211080953.22903.conman@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox