From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.46: ide-cd cdrecord success report
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:43:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021108114318.GX32005@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108111428.F628@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de>
On Fri, Nov 08 2002, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Ok I'm just about convinced now, I'll make 16 the default batch count.
> > I'm very happy to hear that the deadline scheduler gets the job done
> > there.
>
> Isn't it exactly seek_cost, which you want?
Yes it's one request for a non-contig range, or a number of contig ones.
It isn't quite clear that this is always a good thing. Since we are
moving request from the sorted list, there's a chance that even though
serving X and then X+1 will incur a seek, it will be a small one. But
for now, yes, a seek is a seek and 16 is equal to seek_cost and
therefore it will be just the one.
> Would you like to make it tunable from user space somehow?
Yes of course, that has been the plan all along. I'm in fact doing that
right now.
> Since Adam already noticed, that there might not be a "perfect"
> value for all, this is the logical next step.
Noone ever questioned the fact that these tunables should in fact be
tunable.
> PS: If you update, please consider an update of your comments
> there, too ;-)
Patch is sent hours ago, and I did.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-07 17:49 2.5.46: ide-cd cdrecord success report MdkDev
2002-11-07 18:03 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-07 19:01 ` Robinson Maureira Castillo
2002-11-07 18:07 ` Adam Kropelin
[not found] ` <32894.62.65.205.175.1036692849.squirrel@webmail.starman.ee>
2002-11-08 1:53 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-11-08 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-08 2:49 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-11-08 8:05 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-08 10:14 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-11-08 11:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-11-08 13:58 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-08 18:26 ` Whither the "system without /proc" crowd? Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021108114318.GX32005@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox