From: Rusty Lynch <rusty@linux.co.intel.com>
To: vamsi@in.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Multiple kprobes per address
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:00:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211082100.gA8L0Q515460@linux.intel.com> (raw)
I noticed that kprobes is designed around the idea of only allowing
a single probe point per probe address. Why not allow multiple probe
points for a given probe address? Is it a way of limiting complexity?
It looks like it would be fairly straight forward to change get_kprobe(addr)
to be get_kprobes(addr) where it returns a list of probe points associated
with the address, and then tweak do_int3 to work through the entire list.
Would such a change be acceptable?
-rustyl
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-08 21:00 Rusty Lynch [this message]
2002-11-11 8:05 ` Multiple kprobes per address Vamsi Krishna S .
2002-11-11 18:35 ` Rusty Lynch
2002-11-12 8:33 ` Vamsi Krishna S .
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200211082100.gA8L0Q515460@linux.intel.com \
--to=rusty@linux.co.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vamsi@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox