From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.46-bk3: BUG in skbuff.c:178
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 02:18:55 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021110041855.GA17760@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108220215.GA2437@vana>
Em Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:02:15PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:33:24PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > On 8 Nov 02 at 12:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Patch below removes 'bucket' from arp_iter_state, and merges it to the pos.
> It is based on assumption that there is no more than 16M of entries in each
> bucket, and that NEIGH_HASHMASK + 1 + PNEIGH_HASHMASK + 1 < 127
I did that in the past, but it gets too ugly, see previous changeset in
bk tree, lemme see... 1.781.1.52, but anyway, I was aware of this bug but I
was on the run, going to Japan and back in 5 days :-\ Well, I have already
sent this one to several people, so if you could review/test it...
===== net/ipv4/arp.c 1.13 vs edited =====
--- 1.13/net/ipv4/arp.c Mon Oct 21 01:17:08 2002
+++ edited/net/ipv4/arp.c Wed Nov 6 08:00:22 2002
@@ -1140,67 +1140,122 @@
struct arp_iter_state {
int is_pneigh, bucket;
+ union {
+ struct neighbour *n;
+ struct pneigh_entry *pn;
+ } u;
};
-static __inline__ struct neighbour *neigh_get_bucket(struct seq_file *seq,
- loff_t *pos)
+static struct neighbour *neigh_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
{
- struct neighbour *n = NULL;
struct arp_iter_state* state = seq->private;
- loff_t l = *pos;
- int i;
- for (; state->bucket <= NEIGH_HASHMASK; ++state->bucket)
- for (i = 0, n = arp_tbl.hash_buckets[state->bucket]; n;
- ++i, n = n->next)
- /* Do not confuse users "arp -a" with magic entries */
- if ((n->nud_state & ~NUD_NOARP) && !l--) {
- *pos = i;
- goto out;
- }
-out:
- return n;
+ state->is_pneigh = 0;
+
+ for (state->bucket = 0;
+ state->bucket <= NEIGH_HASHMASK;
+ ++state->bucket) {
+ state->u.n = arp_tbl.hash_buckets[state->bucket];
+ while (state->u.n && !(state->u.n->nud_state & ~NUD_NOARP))
+ state->u.n = state->u.n->next;
+ if (state->u.n)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return state->u.n;
}
-static __inline__ struct pneigh_entry *pneigh_get_bucket(struct seq_file *seq,
- loff_t *pos)
+static struct neighbour *neigh_get_next(struct seq_file *seq)
{
- struct pneigh_entry *n = NULL;
struct arp_iter_state* state = seq->private;
- loff_t l = *pos;
- int i;
- for (; state->bucket <= PNEIGH_HASHMASK; ++state->bucket)
- for (i = 0, n = arp_tbl.phash_buckets[state->bucket]; n;
- ++i, n = n->next)
- if (!l--) {
- *pos = i;
- goto out;
- }
-out:
- return n;
+ for (; state->bucket <= NEIGH_HASHMASK;
+ ++state->bucket,
+ state->u.n = arp_tbl.hash_buckets[state->bucket]) {
+ if (state->u.n)
+ do {
+ state->u.n = state->u.n->next;
+ /* Don't confuse "arp -a" w/ magic entries */
+ } while (state->u.n &&
+ !(state->u.n->nud_state & ~NUD_NOARP));
+ if (state->u.n)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return state->u.n;
+}
+
+static loff_t neigh_get_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
+{
+ neigh_get_first(seq);
+ while (pos && neigh_get_next(seq))
+ --pos;
+ return pos;
+}
+
+static struct pneigh_entry *pneigh_get_first(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+ struct arp_iter_state* state = seq->private;
+
+ state->is_pneigh = 1;
+
+ for (state->bucket = 0;
+ state->bucket <= PNEIGH_HASHMASK;
+ ++state->bucket) {
+ state->u.pn = arp_tbl.phash_buckets[state->bucket];
+ if (state->u.pn)
+ break;
+ }
+ return state->u.pn;
+}
+
+static struct pneigh_entry *pneigh_get_next(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+ struct arp_iter_state* state = seq->private;
+
+ for (; state->bucket <= PNEIGH_HASHMASK;
+ ++state->bucket,
+ state->u.pn = arp_tbl.phash_buckets[state->bucket]) {
+ if (state->u.pn)
+ state->u.pn = state->u.pn->next;
+
+ if (state->u.pn)
+ break;
+ }
+ return state->u.pn;
}
-static __inline__ void *arp_get_bucket(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
+static loff_t pneigh_get_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
{
- void *rc = neigh_get_bucket(seq, pos);
+ pneigh_get_first(seq);
+ while (pos && pneigh_get_next(seq))
+ --pos;
+ return pos;
+}
+
+static void *arp_get_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
+{
+ struct arp_iter_state* state = seq->private;
+ void *rc;
+ loff_t p;
+
+ read_lock_bh(&arp_tbl.lock);
+ p = neigh_get_idx(seq, pos);
- if (!rc) {
+ if (p || !state->u.n) {
struct arp_iter_state* state = seq->private;
read_unlock_bh(&arp_tbl.lock);
- state->is_pneigh = 1;
- state->bucket = 0;
- *pos = 0;
- rc = pneigh_get_bucket(seq, pos);
- }
+ pneigh_get_idx(seq, p);
+ rc = state->u.pn;
+ } else
+ rc = state->u.n;
return rc;
}
static void *arp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
- read_lock_bh(&arp_tbl.lock);
- return *pos ? arp_get_bucket(seq, pos) : (void *)1;
+ return *pos ? arp_get_idx(seq, *pos - 1) : (void *)1;
}
static void *arp_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
@@ -1209,38 +1264,19 @@
struct arp_iter_state* state;
if (v == (void *)1) {
- rc = arp_get_bucket(seq, pos);
+ rc = arp_get_idx(seq, 0);
goto out;
}
state = seq->private;
if (!state->is_pneigh) {
- struct neighbour *n = v;
-
- rc = n = n->next;
- if (n)
- goto out;
- *pos = 0;
- ++state->bucket;
- rc = neigh_get_bucket(seq, pos);
+ rc = neigh_get_next(seq);
if (rc)
goto out;
read_unlock_bh(&arp_tbl.lock);
- state->is_pneigh = 1;
- state->bucket = 0;
- *pos = 0;
- rc = pneigh_get_bucket(seq, pos);
- } else {
- struct pneigh_entry *pn = v;
-
- pn = pn->next;
- if (!pn) {
- ++state->bucket;
- *pos = 0;
- pn = pneigh_get_bucket(seq, pos);
- }
- rc = pn;
- }
+ rc = pneigh_get_first(seq);
+ } else
+ rc = pneigh_get_next(seq);
out:
++*pos;
return rc;
@@ -1291,7 +1327,6 @@
static __inline__ void arp_format_pneigh_entry(struct seq_file *seq,
struct pneigh_entry *n)
{
-
struct net_device *dev = n->dev;
int hatype = dev ? dev->type : 0;
char tbuf[16];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-10 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-08 19:33 2.5.46-bk3: BUG in skbuff.c:178 Petr Vandrovec
2002-11-08 22:02 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-11-10 4:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2002-11-11 2:26 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-11-11 2:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-08 19:42 Burton Windle
2002-11-08 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021110041855.GA17760@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox