From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, hch@infradead.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NCR53C9x ESP: C99 designated initializers
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 15:35:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021111203537.GC11636@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037019925.2887.21.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:05:25PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Lots of drivers do
Yes, this part sucks. There needs to be an easy library function that
takes a scsi command pointer, sets up a wait queue, adds the wait queue
struct pointer to the scsi command, sleeps with a timeout, wakes up when
command completes via scsi_done() or timeout fires, returns value based
upon how wake up happened. Right now we don't have that, we only have a
little helper function, scsi_sleep(), for sleeping for a fixed length of
time.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-11 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-03 10:46 [PATCH] NCR53C9x ESP: C99 designated initializers Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-03 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03 14:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-03 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-10 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-10 14:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-11 9:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-11 9:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-11 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-11 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-11 17:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-11-11 20:31 ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-11 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-11 20:35 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2002-11-11 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-11 21:24 ` Doug Ledford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-11 18:30 J.E.J. Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021111203537.GC11636@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox