Re: [PATCHSET] Linux 2.4.20-rc1-jam2

[Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>]

On Wednesday 13 November 2002 02:41, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> Just to public a new relase ;).

Hi J.A.,

just tried to apply on top of pristine 2.4.20-rc1.

for i in 2.4.20-rc1-jam2/*.bz2; do echo $i; bzcat $i | drypatch -p1; done | 
grep -2 FAIL

2.4.20-rc1-jam2/00-rc1aa1.bz2 is fine
[...]
2.4.20-rc1-jam2/33-task_cpu.bz2
patching file arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1027.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c.rej
patching file arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 469.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/s390/kernel/smp.c.rej
patching file arch/s390x/kernel/smp.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 456.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/s390x/kernel/smp.c.rej
can't find file to patch at input line 40
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
--
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
patching file fs/proc/array.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 389.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/proc/array.c.rej
patching file include/linux/sched.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 948 (offset -44 lines).
--
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file kernel/sched.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 236.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 280.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 321.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 412.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 537.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 561.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 575.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1731.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 1743.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 1786.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 1849.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 1859.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 1926.
13 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sched.c.rej
patching file kernel/signal.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 509.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/signal.c.rej
[...]

This is just to scary for me...

Sorry,
Hans-Peter