From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: module mess in -CURRENT
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:36:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021114033853.0E63C2C057@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "14 Nov 2002 02:27:20 -0000." <1037240840.14393.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
In message <1037240840.14393.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> you write:
> On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 00:59, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > People who find the current module situation difficult can just compile in
> > the stuff they need for now.
>
> That makes driver debugging almost impossible. It also makes building a
> test kernel set for a lot of boxes impractical.
Sorry, I know I've been feeding Linus too slowly, but I've just flown
into Spain and I have a tutorial to deliver. I'm solving it my not
sleeping, but that doesn't scale.
> The completely broken unload stuff is going to be a real pig, PCMCIA
> only works modular and doesn't work now the unloads are all broken.
Agreed, that's what "rmmod --force" is for. Patch in the queue, I
promise. That gives more breathing room for fixing the "marked
unsafe" issue.
> OTOH the module rewrite has some nice features and a combo modutils
> is going to sort some of the problem out fairly easily.
Patches welcome, of course. I didn't do any work on the modutils once
they passed "backwards compat exec works, basic features work".
Trying to test both the entire stack of patches, and just the first
three I was sending to Linus, as every tree came out: well, you can
tell my testing wasn't thorough enough for .47.
> The biggest need though is documentation so people can actually fix all
> the drivers for this stuff.
I posted a document previously (again) and it recieved (valid) harsh
criticism for being opaque. I'll rework it. Basically, its an
expansion of the old try_inc_modcount to be a first-class citizen
(hence called try_module_get()). As previously, should be called
(successfully!) before calling through a function ptr which might be
in a module (ie. most code which exposes a "register_xxx" should use
it). Exceptions if that function cannot sleep (and can't be
preemped).
Why is PCMCIA broken?
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-14 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-14 0:02 module mess in -CURRENT Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-14 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-14 1:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-14 2:27 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-14 2:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-14 5:07 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-14 4:36 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-11-14 14:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-14 18:54 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-14 4:06 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <20021114000206.A8245@infradead.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211131655580.6810-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-11-14 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-14 17:32 ` John Alvord
2002-11-14 17:40 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-14 18:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-14 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-15 0:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-15 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-15 3:38 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-15 18:26 ` Kai Henningsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021114033853.0E63C2C057@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox