From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, John Alvord <jalvo@mbay.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: module mess in -CURRENT
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:18:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021114191826.A11146@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021114180117.GM31697@dualathlon.random>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:01:17PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:40:49PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Owens' kbuild-2.5 handled it a different way and didn't need exact
> > > timings. That is especially important since nanosecond time accuracy is
> >
> > You may not believe it, but there are projects other than the kernel
> > that do use make too.
> >
> > > impossible if you are handling a collection of machines doing the
> > > work. NTP is accurate, but not that accurate.
> >
> > The patch does not actually implement nanosecond resolution, but
> > jiffies resolution (1ms on 2.5), which is easily reachable with NTP.
>
> 1msec still leave a reasonable window open IMHO. this problem would need
> sequence numbers updated atomically to be solved correctly without
> regard to the timing that may vary depending on the hardware IMHO (so
> that it could still work on a 1Thz cpu even if it's not a pratical
> matter for at least this decade).
>
The API is ready for nanoseconds so when you feel the need you can
convert it to using do_gettimeofday()
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-14 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20021114000206.A8245@infradead.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211131655580.6810-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-11-14 10:19 ` module mess in -CURRENT Andi Kleen
2002-11-14 17:32 ` John Alvord
2002-11-14 17:40 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-14 18:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-14 18:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2002-11-15 0:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-15 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-15 3:38 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-15 18:26 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-11-15 18:14 ` Linux 2.5.47 -- Trouble booting Xwindows Mark Hamblin
2002-11-14 0:02 module mess in -CURRENT Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-14 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-14 1:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-14 2:27 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-14 2:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-14 5:07 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-14 4:36 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-14 14:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-14 18:54 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-14 4:06 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021114191826.A11146@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jalvo@mbay.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox