Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls

dada1
2002-11-14T08:46:12Z

I beg to differ.

I already use the syscalls.

The patch doesnt change Documentation/vm/hugetlbpage.txt

How one is supposed to use hugetlbfs ? That's not documented.

Before dropping support for syscalls, please change the Documentation.

Thanks

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rik van Riel" <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: "Benjamin LaHaise" <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@digeo.com>; <linux-mm@kvack.org>;
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls

> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> > Since the functionality of the hugetlb syscalls is now available via
> > hugetlbfs with better control over permissions, could you apply the
> > following patch that gets rid of a lot of duplicate and unnescessary
> > code by removing the two hugetlb syscalls?
>
> #include <massive_applause.h>
>
> Yes, lets get rid of this ugliness before somebody actually
> finds a way to use these syscalls...
>
> regards,
>
> Rik
> --
> Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
> http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/
> Current spamtrap: <a
href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>