From: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsuspend and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM=y
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:35:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021116173552.GF19061@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037414484.21974.17.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:41:24AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 18:56, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > But like I said, it's very unlikely any strong interest will ever
> > arise specifically in large-scale i386 checkpointing. Computational
> > workloads are very attached to having clean and efficient FPU's, which
> > i386 lacks. RISC etc. boxen with clean FPU's are more important for
> > that. OTOH if highmem works, why wouldn't bigger highmem boxen work? NFI
>
> Most large scale FP computation jobs are done on x86. RISC stuff isnt
> that much faster if at all. It may be elegant but the PIV and Athlon go
> at 2.5Ghz so make up for elegance by being stupid very fast (note that
> by the PIV and athlon the FPU's are not actually very veryy smart)
Their built-in trancendental ops still beat the pants off RISC clock
for clock, so even at the same clock rate, some number crunching stuff
still wins big on x86. Throw in the cost/FLOPS difference and its
little wonder that very few big machines are being built with anything
but.
--
"Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-16 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-15 8:10 [PATCH] swsuspend and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM=y Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-11-15 8:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-15 9:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-15 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-15 12:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-15 18:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-15 18:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-15 13:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-11-15 18:12 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-15 18:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-16 2:41 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-16 3:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-16 17:35 ` Oliver Xymoron [this message]
2002-11-15 11:54 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-15 11:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021116173552.GF19061@waste.org \
--to=oxymoron@waste.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox