Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47-mm3 with contest

Con Kolivas
2002-11-16T06:16:51Z

>Con Kolivas wrote:
>> Note the significant discrepancy between mm1 and mm3. This reminds me of
>> what happened last time I enabled shared 3rd level pagetables - Andrew do
>> you want me to do a set of numbers with this disabled?
>
>That certainly couldn't hurt. But your tests are, in general, tesging
>the IO scheduler. And the IO scheduler has changed radically in each
>of the recent -mm's.
>
>So testing with rbtree-iosched reverted would really be the only way
>to draw comparisons on how the rest of the code is behaving.

Ok. Tested with shared disabled (2.5.47-mm3ns) and are very similar. These
were the only significant differences:

read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 218.5 34 10 2 3.06
2.5.47-mm3ns [2] 257.9 29 11 2 3.61

xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 211.3 38 2 6 2.96
2.5.47-mm3ns [2] 152.8 49 2 7 2.14

Con.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE91eRiF6dfvkL3i1gRAtclAJwLr2jxRHuhqkKUpwraJW3z8zawAACffH+c
4D5+HaXXSNwuyiGqULB02B4=
=dpn2