[BENCHMARK] 2.5.47-mm3 with contest

Con Kolivas
2002-11-16T03:15:36Z

Here are some contest benchmarks for 2.5.47-mm3.

These include 2 experimental additions to contest. One is cacherun which is an
unloaded kernel compile immediately following a previous compile. The second
is dbench_load, where dbench (16*num_cpus) is run in a continuous loop. The
number of loads in dbench_loads at the moment is which run it was up to when
terminated (ie a run of 1 means it never got to finish).

Note the config of 2.5 kernels includes preempt.

Config of 2.5.47-mm3 includes shared 3rd level pagetables.

noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [5] 71.7 93 0 0 1.00
2.4.19 [5] 69.0 97 0 0 0.97
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 72.2 93 0 0 1.01
2.5.47 [3] 73.5 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 73.6 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 73.7 93 0 0 1.03

cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [2] 66.6 99 0 0 0.93
2.4.19 [2] 68.0 99 0 0 0.95
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 67.2 99 0 0 0.94
2.5.47 [3] 68.3 99 0 0 0.96
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 68.4 99 0 0 0.96
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 68.3 99 0 0 0.96

process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 109.5 57 119 44 1.53
2.4.19 [3] 106.5 59 112 43 1.49
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 110.7 58 119 43 1.55
2.5.47 [3] 83.4 82 22 21 1.17
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 83.0 83 21 20 1.16
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 84.2 82 22 21 1.18

dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [1] 346.6 20 1 57 4.85
2.4.19 [1] 342.6 20 1 62 4.80
2.4.20-rc1 [1] 309.8 23 2 50 4.34
2.5.47 [2] 224.2 33 1 44 3.14
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 201.6 38 1 39 2.82

ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 117.4 63 1 7 1.64
2.4.19 [2] 106.5 70 1 8 1.49
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 102.1 72 1 7 1.43
2.5.47 [3] 93.9 80 1 5 1.32
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 94.0 81 1 5 1.32
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 94.0 81 1 6 1.32

xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 150.8 49 2 8 2.11
2.4.19 [1] 132.4 55 2 9 1.85
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 180.7 40 3 8 2.53
2.5.47 [3] 167.1 45 2 7 2.34
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 118.5 64 1 7 1.66
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 211.3 38 2 6 2.96

io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 474.1 15 36 10 6.64
2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 6.90
2.4.20-rc1 [2] 1142.2 6 90 10 16.00
2.5.47 [3] 165.9 46 9 9 2.32
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 126.3 61 5 8 1.77
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 117.1 65 4 8 1.64

read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 102.3 70 6 3 1.43
2.4.19 [2] 134.1 54 14 5 1.88
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 173.2 43 20 5 2.43
2.5.47 [3] 103.4 74 6 4 1.45
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 100.6 76 7 4 1.41
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 218.5 34 10 2 3.06

list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 90.2 76 1 17 1.26
2.4.19 [1] 89.8 77 1 20 1.26
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 88.8 77 0 12 1.24
2.5.47 [3] 100.2 71 1 20 1.40
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 102.4 69 1 19 1.43
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 101.2 71 1 21 1.42

mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.18 [3] 103.3 70 32 3 1.45
2.4.19 [3] 100.0 72 33 3 1.40
2.4.20-rc1 [3] 105.9 69 32 2 1.48
2.5.47 [3] 151.1 49 35 2 2.12
2.5.47-mm1 [5] 127.0 58 29 2 1.78
2.5.47-mm3 [2] 243.8 31 39 1 3.41

Note the significant discrepancy between mm1 and mm3. This reminds me of what
happened last time I enabled shared 3rd level pagetables - Andrew do you want
me to do a set of numbers with this disabled?

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE91bnlF6dfvkL3i1gRAlnMAKCODJZ26fA1zvTp0mcvtzydO7xk3ACfTh8A
Rxk3RlPecInc8ef7Ne8bWMg=
=+908