From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Run timers as softirqs, not tasklets
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 17:16:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021117171625.C7530@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
Seems to me that the timer code is attempting to replicate the softirq
characteristics at the tasklet level, which is a little pointless. This
patch converts timers to be a first-class softirq citizen.
Ingo, was there a reason you didn't do it this way to begin with?
diff -u linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h
--- linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h 2002-11-16 22:28:40.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h 2002-11-17 11:23:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
enum
{
HI_SOFTIRQ=0,
+ TIMER_SOFTIRQ,
NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
SCSI_SOFTIRQ,
--- linux-2.5.47/kernel/timer.c 2002-11-14 10:52:17.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.5.47-pci/kernel/timer.c 2002-11-17 11:27:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -66,9 +66,6 @@ typedef struct tvec_t_base_s tvec_base_t
/* Fake initialization */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(tvec_base_t, tvec_bases) = { SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED };
-/* Fake initialization needed to avoid compiler breakage */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, timer_tasklet) = { NULL };
-
static void check_timer_failed(timer_t *timer)
{
static int whine_count;
@@ -766,9 +763,9 @@ rwlock_t xtime_lock __cacheline_aligned_
unsigned long last_time_offset;
/*
- * This function runs timers and the timer-tq in softirq context.
+ * This function runs timers and the timer-tq in bottom half context.
*/
-static void run_timer_tasklet(unsigned long data)
+static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
{
tvec_base_t *base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, smp_processor_id());
@@ -781,7 +778,7 @@ static void run_timer_tasklet(unsigned l
*/
void run_local_timers(void)
{
- tasklet_hi_schedule(&per_cpu(timer_tasklet, smp_processor_id()));
+ raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
}
/*
@@ -1140,7 +1137,6 @@ static void __devinit init_timers_cpu(in
}
for (j = 0; j < TVR_SIZE; j++)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
- tasklet_init(&per_cpu(timer_tasklet, cpu), run_timer_tasklet, 0UL);
}
static int __devinit timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
@@ -1167,4 +1163,5 @@ void __init init_timers(void)
timer_cpu_notify(&timers_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_UP_PREPARE,
(void *)(long)smp_processor_id());
register_cpu_notifier(&timers_nb);
+ open_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_timer_softirq, NULL);
}
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-17 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-17 17:16 Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2002-11-17 18:46 ` [PATCH] Run timers as softirqs, not tasklets Dipankar Sarma
2002-11-17 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 22:29 ` george anzinger
2002-11-18 22:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-17 19:23 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021117171625.C7530@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox