public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rml@tech9.net, riel@surriel.com, akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: unusual scheduling performance
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:18:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021118081854.GJ23425@holomorphy.com> (raw)

On 16x, 2.5.47 kernel compiles take about 26s when the machine is
otherwise idle.

On 32x, 2.5.47 kernel compiles take about 48s when the machine is 
otherwise idle.

When a single-threaded task consumes an entire cpu, kernel compiles
take 36s on 32s when the machine is idle aside from the task consuming
that cpu and the kernel compile itself.

I suspect the scheduler, because cpu reporting in top(1) shows that a
two or more cpu-intensive tasks are concentrated on the same cpu, and
some long-lived tasks appear to be "bouncing" across cpus. If someone
with knowledge and/or expertise with respect to scheduling semantics
could look into this, I would be much obliged. Resolving this would
likely address many SMP and/or NUMA scheduling performance issues.


Thanks,
Bill

             reply	other threads:[~2002-11-18  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-18  8:18 William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-11-18 16:34 ` unusual scheduling performance Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-18 16:53   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-18 17:53     ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 18:16       ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-18 18:34         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 18:52           ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-18 18:58             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 18:56           ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 18:59             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 20:17       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-18 22:51         ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 23:09           ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-18 23:20             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 23:26             ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 23:30               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 23:33           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-20 22:19   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021118081854.GJ23425@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox