public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SCSI I/O performance problems when CONFIG_HIGHIO is off
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:05:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021118120531.GC839@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037392310.13531.419.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>

On Fri, Nov 15 2002, Steve Lord wrote:
> Jens,
> 
> As you know, for the last week or so I have been battling some
> performance issues in XFS and 2.4.20-rc1. Well, we finally found
> the culprit back in 2.4.20-pre2.
> 
> When the block highmem patch was included, it added highmem_io to the
> scsi controller structure. This can only ever be set to one if
> CONFIG_HIGHIO is set. Yet there are several spots in the scsi
> code which test based on its value regardless.
> 
>         /*
>          * we really want to use sg even for a single segment request,
>          * however some people just cannot be bothered to write decent
>          * driver code so we can't risk to break somebody making the
>          * assumption that sg requests will always contain at least 2
>          * segments. if the driver is 32-bit dma safe, then use sg for
>          * 1 entry anyways. if not, don't rely on the driver handling this
>          * case.
>          */
>         if (count == 1 && !SCpnt->host->highmem_io) {
>                 this_count = req->current_nr_sectors;
>                 goto single_segment;
>         }

Steve,

Something isn't quite making sense. If we go over every single instance
of checking ->highmem_io, they all look sane (ie checking on non-highmem
setup must yield 0). So that part looks good.

However, I think a typo snuck in there, in exactly the spot you pasted
above. Could you try 2.4.20-rc2 with this patch applied?

===== drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c 1.9 vs edited =====
--- 1.9/drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c	Mon Sep 16 09:25:10 2002
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c	Mon Nov 18 13:04:41 2002
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@
 	 * case.
  	 */
 	if (count == 1 && !SCpnt->host->highmem_io) {
-		this_count = req->current_nr_sectors;
+		this_count = req->nr_sectors;
 		goto single_segment;
 	}
 

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-18 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-15 20:31 SCSI I/O performance problems when CONFIG_HIGHIO is off Steve Lord
2002-11-16  8:18 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-18 12:05 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-11-18 14:05   ` Stephen Lord
2002-11-18 14:12     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021118120531.GC839@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox