From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Vergoz Michael <mvergoz@sysdoor.com>
Cc: Michael Knigge <Michael.Knigge@set-software.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.xx: 8139 isn't working
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:09:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021118220920.GA3636@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <019401c28eef$492bcb50$76405b51@romain>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:43:09AM +0100, Vergoz Michael wrote:
> hmmm
>
> life is strange.....
>
> i'v the same card as u and it work for me !
That's why you definitely need to feed *REAL* information to Jeff so that he
can find with you what in your patch makes it work for you, and will probably
make it work for Michael and others. Your patch may work because of a side
effect, and may not work on other systems because of other side effects (apic,
irq numbers,...).
None of you have provided even the smallest amount of info. One says "it works
only with this strange patch" and the other one "it doesn't for me even with
your strange patch". Even Windowsians are more precise with their support. How
would you hope that your patch be accepted with such an attitude ?
- does modprobe complain ?
- does modprobe return ?
- do you get an oops ?
- does dmesg show errors or warnings (irq routing conflicts, unsupported chip).
- does the machine lock up hard at load time ?
- does the machine lock up when you set the interface up ?
- does the machine lock up when you start sending ?
- is the link on the board lit ?
- does the machine resolve arp ?
- does the machine show timeouts ?
- what speed are your using it at ? (100 fdx, 100 hdx, 10 hdx...)
And as Jeff said, please read REPORTING-BUGS. A simple lspci could show us that
in fact you have a known-buggy chipset and that your patch is indeed a
workaround for the chipset and not for the NIC.
Thanks in advance,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-18 10:20 2.4.xx: 8139 isn't working Michael Knigge
2002-11-18 9:30 ` Vergoz Michael
2002-11-18 11:26 ` Michael Knigge
[not found] ` <015f01c28eed$f112ce10$76405b51@romain>
[not found] ` <20021118.11392845@knigge.local.net>
2002-11-18 10:43 ` Vergoz Michael
2002-11-18 10:54 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2002-11-18 22:09 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2002-11-18 10:56 ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-11-19 3:27 ` APIC? IO-APIC? (was Re: 2.4.xx: 8139 isn't working) dee jay
2002-11-19 10:07 ` Erik Hensema
2002-11-18 17:48 ` 2.4.xx: 8139 isn't working Jeff Garzik
2002-11-19 8:47 ` Michael Knigge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-19 8:49 Michael Knigge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021118220920.GA3636@alpha.home.local \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=Michael.Knigge@set-software.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mvergoz@sysdoor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox