From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Linux Scsi Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: Why /dev/sdc1 doesn't show up...
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:52:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021119055636.94C182C088@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:49:21 +1100."
> right). Or you can run a notifier on "enlivening" a module: I'd hoped
> to avoid that.
Actually, after some thought, this seems to clearly be the Right
Thing, because it solves another existing race. Consider a module
which does:
if (!register_foo(&my_foo))
goto cleanup;
if (!create_proc_entry(&my_entry))
goto cleanup_foo;
If register_foo() calls /sbin/hotplug, the module can still fail to
load and /sbin/hotplug is called for something that doesn't exist.
With the new module loader, you can also have /sbin/hotplug try to
access the module before it's gone live, which will fail to prevent
the "using before we know module won't fail init" race.
Now, if you run /sbin/hotplug out of a notifier which is fired when
the module actually goes live, this problem vanishes. It also means
we can block module unload until /sbin/hotplug is run.
The part that makes this feel like the Right Thing is that adding to
init/main.c:
/* THIS_MODULE == NULL */
notifier_call_chain(&module_notifiers, MODULE_LIVE, NULL);
means that /sbin/hotplug is called for everything which was registered
at boot. (We may not want to do this, but in general the symmetry
seems really nice).
[ Note: the logic for /sbin/hotplug applies to any similar "publicity"
function which promises that something now exists. ]
Al, thoughts?
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-19 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-19 5:52 Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-11-19 7:12 ` Why /dev/sdc1 doesn't show up Alexander Viro
2002-11-19 21:29 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-19 22:33 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-11-19 16:06 ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-19 17:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-11-19 21:42 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-20 23:41 ` john slee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-17 19:52 Doug Ledford
2002-11-17 20:01 ` Alexander Viro
2002-11-17 20:12 ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-17 20:16 ` Alexander Viro
2002-11-17 23:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-11-17 23:45 ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-18 8:52 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-18 9:51 ` Alexander Viro
2002-11-18 23:49 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-19 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-19 20:54 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-20 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-24 22:30 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-19 0:09 ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-19 20:58 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-19 0:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-18 10:02 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021119055636.94C182C088@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox