From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/CFT] Separate obj/src dir
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:31:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021119123115.C16028@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1021119151730.5943A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>; from root@chaos.analogic.com on Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:22:45PM -0500
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:22:45PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > Based on some initial work by Kai Germaschewski I have made a
> > working prototype of separate obj/src tree.
> >
> > Usage example:
> > #src located in ~/bk/linux-2.5.sepobj
> > mkdir ~/compile/v2.5
> > cd ~/compile/v2.5
> > sh ../../kb/v2.5/kbuild
>
> [SNIPPED...]
>
> I have a question; "What problem is this supposed to solve?"
> This looks like a M$ism to me. Real source trees don't
> look like this. If you don't have write access to the source-
> code tree, you are screwed on a real project anyway. That's
> why we have CVS, tar and other tools to provide a local copy.
It can be really nice to maintain a bunch of different architectures at
the same time from the same tree. It also makes it really easy to
"clean" a tree.
On the other hand, I do wonder whether ccache could be used to get the
same effect. Sam?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-19 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-19 20:11 [RFC/CFT] Separate obj/src dir Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 20:22 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-19 20:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 20:46 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-19 20:50 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-11-19 20:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 21:37 ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-20 4:04 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-19 21:55 ` Brad Hards
2002-11-19 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-19 21:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-21 16:54 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-11-19 20:31 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-11-19 20:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-19 20:48 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-11-19 21:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-21 16:53 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-11-19 20:51 ` Brian Jackson
2002-11-19 22:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-20 6:37 ` Simon Fowler
[not found] ` <mailman.1037774521.18360.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-11-20 7:06 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-11-20 13:10 ` [RFC/CFT] " Alex Riesen
2002-11-20 13:14 ` Alex Riesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021119123115.C16028@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox